I’m Not Really a Lumberjack and I’m Not Actually OK; Angry Gambler Strikes Back

Not everyone carrying an axe is a lumberjack

Ever seen a lumberjack in a casino? Not likely, since most lumberjacks do not carry their axes generally around with them on nights out. But two stories have popped up in the media showing that non-lumberjacks don’t stick to these necessarily rules.

Axing For Trouble

The first of those two tales of violence occurred in a village bar in Fontaniva, Italy, the place where a disgruntled gambler decided to exact their revenge on some slots that are unsuspecting after losing 5,000 euros (over $6,500) in 2 weeks.

The father of two, aged 48, was caught on CCTV cameras, footage of which has since stormed the media and video clip streaming internet sites, where watchers can watch the gambler smash up seven machines as nearby customers dive for cover.

The machine hacker calmly strolls out of the bar, but not before giving a thumbs up towards the one-armed bandits after blowing off steam. Either it was a sign of victory, or a show of friendship towards these particular machines. When dealing with crazy, interpretations are anyone’s guess.

The anger-released slot axe-murderer then waited calmly for arrest outside a bar that is nearby.

‘ He comes in here all the right time to try out the machines,’ said who owns the bar, who chose probably wisely- to remain nameless. ‘ He’s had some wins, but he spends a great deal of money. He is a laborer and only works any now and then.’ evidently, this might be one worker who keeps his equipment that is own handy.

‘He’s normally a tremendously man that is quiet. He just strolled in extremely calmly with an axe and smashed all the devices. There were a few customers they were terrified,’ he added by them at the time and.

Because of this of his strangely calm yet violent outburst, the guy was sentenced for six months for criminal damage and control of an unpleasant weapon. But prison overcrowding got him off with nothing significantly more than a slap on the hand.

But Wait, There’s More…

The second among these two stories is really a bit more frightening, because casinopokies777.com the axe was wielded maybe not at the slots, but at a member of the employees at a betting store in the Welsh capital of Cardiff.

Police reported that the ‘particularly violent’ incident left the shop assistant at a Ladbrokes betting shop in Cardiff ‘in a situation of shock.’

Before raiding the till and making down with some money, one of three suspects in the robbery was seen wielding an axe over their head, threatening the Ladbrokes’ worker with injury or worse if he didn’t comply.

A authorities spokesperson investigating the criminal activity said that two men, both wearing ski masks, entered the bookie’s shop at 9:30 pm in the nights the incident. One calmly endured guard at the doorway, while the other violently threatened the assistant utilizing the tree-chopping weapon.

The frightened store assistant then handed over what police referred to as a ‘quantity of money,’ and also the men fled the scene in a getaway car driven by a third suspect.

Police are now appealing to the local public for information that could assist apprehend the violent criminals, as unlike the Italian axe-wielder, they certainly did not wait calmly for arresting officers to arrive on the scene.

Whose Casino Could It Be Anyhow? Boston and Everett, Mass. Duke It Out

The battle continues over who gets to vote on Everett casino plan

Whilst every and each of the three licensing battles for casino resort projects in Massachusetts has already established its share of drama, none has proven more contentious than the fight over the casino slated to be located in the greater Boston area. Now, one Boston candidate that is mayoral threatening a lawsuit over one particular proposition that would put a casino within the neighboring town of Everett.

Voting Rights

The appropriate option is pertaining to the theory that neighboring communities could be suffering from casino projects, but won’t have the opportunity to vote on whether those casinos should be opened in the place that is first. Suffolk District Attorney Daniel F. Conley, a candidate for mayor of Boston, has been one of a handful of prospects whom have suggested that most of Boston should manage to vote on a casino that might be situated in East Boston, for example.

When it comes to your proposed Wynn casino task in Everett, Conley claims that allowing only Everett residents to vote on it is unfair to the surrounding communities. Should the East Boston proposal fail, then, he would file suit to stop the Everett casino based in the impact it might have on many Boston neighborhoods.

‘The Wynn proposal ended up being voted…on in just one community,’ Conley said throughout a press conference at City Hall Plaza, ‘while residents and businesses from Charlestown to Somerville and beyond will bear its traffic, economic, and social burdens but receive none of the proposed benefits.’

Based on the state laws that produced the chance of three casinos that are new Massachusetts, only communities hosting casinos actually get yourself a vote on whether or not allowing the projects to be built. However, casino developers are required to negotiate settlement, with arbitration needed in the event that gambling enterprises and governments that are localn’t come to an answer on their own.

Conley has proposed having a path that is not really outlined in the 2011 casino law when it comes to the East Boston casino proposal, one that is being developed by Caesars Entertainment and Suffolk Downs. He would have the whole city of Boston vote on whether to approve the proposal, while still granting East Boston veto power within the vote that is entire. The casino would have to pass votes in both East Boston alone and across the entire city in order to be approved in other words.

Yay or Nay?

A Boston Globe survey found that six of the eight mayoral candidates who answered that question were in favor of it, with just two coming out against it (with Conley and one other candidate not answering the question) while Conley has not specified whether or not he supports the East Boston casino proposal. Meanwhile, four of ten applicants supported allowing the whole city to vote on the casino, while six favored limiting the vote to simply East Boston. Another poll of Boston residents found that 44% had been in favor of the casino, while 37% opposed it.

Even when voters back these proposals, only one will ultimately be chosen by the state as the site that is future of casino in the Boston area. Along side the Everett and East Boston casino plans, addititionally there is a competing proposal from Crossroads Massachusetts to place a casino in Milford.

Labour MP Disses Sports Books, Takes Donation from Retired Bookie CEO

Chuka Umunna, taken up to task for accepting donation

Chuka Umunna, cited as the increasing star of the UK’s Labour Party who has publicly announced his discontent towards the bookmaking industry got their own hand caught in the sports book cookie container after accepting a contribution of £20,000 (more than $30,000) from the retired premier activities betting company CEO.

Slaps Bookies While Accepting Donation

As a wagering shop critic who has publicly decried the number of betting shops, Umunna nonetheless accepted the large donation from chairman emeritus of the Gala Coral Group, Neil Goulden, causing members of the Conservative Party to call the shadow business secretary out, claiming Umunna is guilty of adopting double requirements.

Since Gala Coral Group is one for the largest bookies in Britain and accounts for a number that is large of outlets, with 1,800 bookies throughout the nation- it just didn’t really read well.

Umunna has even attacked the industry directly with a campaign directed at reducing the spread of bookies and betting stores in the area roads of his south London Streatham constituency, and went as far as to promise ‘new powers to control the number of betting shops.’

‘I know there clearly was huge concern that some streets in our area are steadily filling up with betting shops and payday loan organizations that take advantage of our community, rather than help us,’ wrote Umunna in a study to local voters earlier this year.

‘ Can anyone really credibly believe anything Chuka ever Umunna claims?’ questioned Tory Party vice-chairman Bob Neill. ‘He says one thing in public places and does another behind closed doors. Their hypocrisy appears to be limitless.’ And that is very uncommon for the politician.

Spared on a Technicality

But, fighting back in the corner of the Labour Party MP, a representative for Umunna reported that ‘this donation was made by an individual Labour Party supporter in a personal capacity, and was accepted in respect with the guidelines and precisely declared.’

Officially, the donation from Goulden was registered as being made ‘to support the office of Chuka Umunna in his capacity as Shadow Secretary of State for Business, and for staffing,’ so it can officially pass as legitimate.

And while Goulden is no further a relative mind of the Gala Coral Group of operations, the ten years he spent as managing director, chief executive and chairman of the group means he still provides consultancy services and chairs the Responsible Gaming Trust.

Whether it’s a completely innocent donation or not, and whether or perhaps not the Conservative Party that are looking to destroy the promotion of a rival MP by claiming hypocrisy, Umunna was still a bit red-faced when the news broke, especially after taking this kind of difficult stance against the spread of the industry in their local constituency.

‘ The thing that is only know he undoubtedly believes is that the capital is filled with ‘trash’ and ‘C-list’ wannabes,’ claimed Bob Neill.

Umunna, who is thought to be described as a future Labour Party leader, has already experienced his fair share of embarrassment as earlier this year his workplace ended up being accused of modifying their Wikipedia page showing evaluations between himself and Barack Obama.